lootgrade.
THE GAMING SERVICES LAB

Know more.
Before you buy.

Gaming services, under the microscope.
Fact-checked public evidence and paid tests behind every verdict.

Evidence before a scorePublic test protocol
TEST FILES

See what goes into a verdict.

Browse company research files and the evidence required for a service test. Results follow documented orders.

156research files
94game & series topics
Tests pending
Explore test files
COMPARE

Same conditions. Clear differences.

Put two evidence files side by side. Check the game, region, service, and test status before drawing a conclusion.

5weighted criteria
0published scores
Compare files side by side
EXPLORE BY GAME

Find your game.

All test files

Search the full game catalogue or filter by genre. Each title keeps its offer scope and evidence status separate.

94 games & series
League of Legends game artworkLG / 01MOBA

League of Legends iconLeague of Legends

Boosting test files

Valorant game artworkLG / 02FPS

Valorant iconValorant

Boosting test files

Counter-Strike 2 game artworkLG / 03FPS

Counter-Strike 2 artworkCounter-Strike 2

Boosting test files

Dota 2 game artworkLG / 04MOBA

Dota 2 logoDota 2

Boosting test files

Wild Rift artworkLG / 05MOBA

Wild Rift logoWild Rift

Boosting test files

Teamfight Tactics artworkLG / 06STRATEGY

Teamfight Tactics logoTeamfight Tactics

Boosting test files

EA Sports FC logoEA FC
LG / 07GAME SERIES

EA Sports FC logoEA Sports FC

Boosting test files

Apex Legends game artworkLG / 08FPS

Apex Legends iconApex Legends

Game-specific service files

Fortnite game artworkLG / 09FPS

Fortnite iconFortnite

Game-specific service files

World of Warcraft game artworkLG / 10RPG

World of Warcraft iconWorld of Warcraft

Game-specific service files

Rocket League game artworkLG / 11SPORTS

Rocket League iconRocket League

Game-specific service files

Overwatch 2 game artworkLG / 12FPS

Overwatch 2 iconOverwatch 2

Game-specific service files

Showing 12 of 94 research topics

KNOW WHAT YOU ARE BUYING

Different services. Different tests.

Service types

Define the work first. A result applies to the service and conditions actually tested.

SIDE BY SIDE

Put two files on the bench.

Compare evidence status and the measurements needed for a verdict.

First service
VS
Second service
Compare files
THE EVIDENCE STANDARD

A verdict you can check.

Public sources and real purchases serve different purposes.
Every conclusion must identify its evidence, date, and scope.

Paid-order records Measured delivery 70% tests / 30% public evidence
01

Fact-check public sources

Trustpilot, qualifying review sites, primary records, dates, and claim checks.

02

Sample & test purchases

Randomly selected ordinary orders within a fixed game, service, and region.

03

Publish the evidence

Both component scores, linked evidence, sample sizes, and limitations.

70% tested. 30% fact-checked.

Our final score combines empirical purchases with verified public evidence. Protection, delivery, price, support, and terms divide only the test component. A composite score requires both components.

Inside the methodology
70%

Our empirical tests

Randomized paid orders, receipts, measured delivery, and support records.

30%

Fact-checked public evidence

Trustpilot, qualifying review sites, and dated primary-source checks.

Both components need evidence. A missing component stays blank; its weight is never reassigned.

Methodology published · Empirical tests and public-evidence assessments pending

BEFORE YOU COMMIT

A little research goes a long way.

All buyer guides
RESEARCH NOTES

Check the offer. Understand the evidence.

All blog articles
THE DETAILS

A few fair questions.

Where are the scores?+

The circular Public Trust Score identifies a historical source index or a separately labelled editorial assessment. Editorial assessments are assigned values, not outputs of the historical source average. Each file explains its basis, dates, scope, and commercial relationships. Historical snapshots are not verified current ratings or paid-test verdicts. Our composite score uses 70% empirical testing and 30% fact-checked public evidence. Neither component has qualified under this methodology yet. A final composite needs both components. Missing evidence stays blank, not zero.

How will services be compared?+

Compare the same game, service, region, route, and options. Ordinary paid orders use a recorded randomized sampling plan. Five criteria divide the 70% empirical component; Trustpilot, qualifying review sites, and primary-source checks inform the other 30%. Every result includes its source, date, and scope.

Can a service pay for a better position?+

LootGrade does not offer paid ranking positions. If affiliate links are introduced, they will be disclosed on the relevant page and will not contribute to a score.

Does a high score mean there is no account risk?+

No. A score will describe a documented test under specific conditions. It cannot guarantee future delivery or override a game publisher’s rules. Check the current publisher terms before purchasing any third-party service.

METHODOLOGY V2.0 / OCTOBER 13, 2026Meet the project